Which of Saudi Arabia: global mediator and regional stabilizer or global negotiator and stabilizer of global regions?

“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as a powerful promoter of peace and diplomacy in the Middle East, but also a global mediator”. This is what we see in the Saudi Nation.
How many nations are there in this situation? How many nations are perceived in this way?
Other people’s perception of a nation and its real potential, for that’s what we’re talking about, are two totally different things.
Seeing a vast mountain as a hill is not the same as seeing it as it is.
Should a kingdom with such enormous potential to negotiate on a global level and stabilize global regions be perceived differently, especially at a lower level?
If everyone perceives the kingdom in this way, and the kingdom is content with what people say about it, how can it become a leader or deploy its leadership?
All leadership depends on external perception, but even more so on internal perception. And the maturing of this perception ends up moving the lines in this direction.

Scroll to Top